DtEC - High Performance Random Packing

High Performance Random Packing

DtEC offers various types of industry standard high performance random packing.

DMTP High Performance Random Packing

DMTP No. 25 in 304L SS

Provides greater capacity than other random packing:

13% more capacity than 25mm (1") pall rings
22% more capacity than 40mm (1½") pall rings
17% more capacity than 50mm (2") pall rings

Gives lower pressure drop than equivalent size pall rings:

DMTP No. 50 in 316L SS

39% lower ΔP than 1" pall rings
40% lower ΔP than 1½" pall rings
42% lower ΔP than 2" pall rings

Minimizes liquid hold-up (residence time)

Provides greater efficiency than other random packing

DMTP No. 50 in Copper

DMTP	Nominal Size	No.	15	25	40	50	60	70
Metal	Surface Area	m²/m³	282	223	154	98	85	59
Metal	Packing Factor	m^-1	167	134	79	59	52	39

DMR High Performance Random Packing

DMR No. 2A in PPL

This packing is available in both metal and plastic.

A key feature of this packing is the aspect ratio (height divided by diameter) of 0.3, which gives it significantly more capacity and efficiency and a much lower pressure drop than equivalent size pall rings.

DMR High Performance Random Packing MOC - Metal

DMR	Nominal Size	No.	1	1.5	2	2.5	3	4
Metal	Surface Area	m²/m³	256	191	159	126	104	80
Metal	Packing Factor	m^-1	131	95	72	62	46	33
Plastic	Surface Area	m²/m³	279		164		132
Plastic	Packing Factor	m^-1	85		52		39

a-Pak High Performance Plastic Packing

a-Pak High Performance Random Packing MOC - PPL

For stripping and absorption applications DtEC supplies a high performance random plastic packing unmatched by any 2^nd generation packing. The nominal size of the packing is equivalent to 2" with a specific surface area of 101.5 m²/m³ and a packing factor of 42.7 m^-1. It offers the following advantages:

26% greater capacity than 2" pall rings
60% greater capacity than 1½" pall rings

68% greater efficiency than 3½" pall rings
25% greater efficiency than 2" pall rings
10% greater efficiency than 1½" pall rings

20% lower pressure drop than 3½" pall rings
50% lower pressure drop than 2" pall rings
8% lower pressure drop than 1½" pall rings

The pressure drop savings translate to considerable increases in capacity and hence the size of new towers and fans can be significantly reduced.